Certorari Petition Granted in ADEC v. EPA, Red Dog Mine Air Permit Dispute February 24, 2003
"We are committed to see this dispute through this final chapter," Murkowski said, "and we hope to correct what we believe to be a serious over-reaching of authority by the EPA. We look forward to briefing and arguing this important case before the Supreme Court. Ten other states have supported the Alaska petition to the Supreme Court, and they will be our allies as the court hears and decides on this important national issue on the rights and responsibilities of each state to manage air quality." The dispute arose three years
ago when EPA disagreed with a permit proposed by ADEC specifying
pollution control technology for the Red Dog Mine. After prolonged
negotiations, EPA and ADEC reached impasse, and EPA ordered ADEC
not to issue the proposed permit. Believing that EPA had exceeded
its authority in vetoing the state permit, ADEC issued it Last summer, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld EPA's actions. The state disagreed with the Circuit Court's analysis and conclusion, and requested the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. "We continue to believe that EPA disregarded the provisions by which air permitting is delegated to the state, and exceeded its authority in vetoing the state's permit, and we now look forward to convincing the Supreme Court of that position," said Attorney General Gregg Renkes. This case goes to the core
roles and relationships between EPA and the state. EPA promulgates
and enforces nation-wide air quality standards. ADEC writes permits
to protect Alaskan air quality and regulate Alaskan industries.
The ironic aspect of the dispute, which the state intends to
demonstrate to the Supreme Court, is that the ADEC proposed permit
Source of News Release:
|